A Professional Valuation Is Key
As a business owner, you already
understand the importance of
business valuations. Knowing proper
values for your business assets
smoothes transitions, sales and
liquidations. Unfortunately, many
business owners neglect to obtain a
professional valuation when
preparing to divorce their spouses.
Because emotions are typically
negative -- anxiety, anger and
mistrust -- one spouse may suspect
that the other is hiding or
undervaluing significant assets in
an attempt to keep them out of the
divorce settlement. This suspicion
often arises when a family-owned
business is at stake. Divorce is
never easy. But, as a business owner
involved in a divorce, you can take
steps to make the marriage
dissolution as painless as possible.
The first step is consulting a
reliable, impartial, experienced
valuator. The next step is preparing
and educating yourself about the ins
and outs of valuing assets for
divorce purposes.
Key Points of Divorce-Related
Valuations - Keep in mind that each state has
its own laws and legal precedents in
divorce cases. Your valuator should
understand how these laws affect the
valuation process, but consulting an
attorney is also essential. Beyond
state law and precedent, other
characteristics differentiate
divorce-related business valuations
from others. Let’s take a closer
look at these points and their
implications for the valuation of
your business.
Marital Property - This is property
you acquired during your marriage,
regardless of how title is held. But
marital property usually excludes
property you or your spouse acquired
before the marriage or through gift
or inheritance during the marriage.
Community Property - This
assumes joint and equal ownership of
marital property acquired while you
were married.
The Valuation Date - This
can be: 1) the date of separation,
2) the date of the divorce filing or
3) the date of the divorce. Make
sure the valuation date is fixed at
the start of the valuation
engagement. Otherwise, date
discrepancies may invalidate the
valuation.
The Standard of Value - The
standard of value can be a
minefield. One unique aspect of
finding value for a divorce
settlement is that the valuator is
typically not seeking the business’s
investment value. Because the
business usually isn’t going to be
sold, its value to a specific buyer
isn’t particularly relevant.
Although many of the considerations
are the same as for determining sale
value, some substantial differences
exist. As with the valuation date,
all parties should agree on the
standard of value at the start of
the process. (See “It’s Not
Necessarily Fair (Market Value)” on
page 3.)
Buy-Sell Agreements - Your
valuator should be familiar with
your state’s precedents regarding
buy-sell agreements. Some state
courts ignore the agreements, while
others consider them valid.
Adjustments to Financial
Statements - Your valuator may
need to adjust your company’s
financial statements in several
areas. For instance, as the owner,
you may have drawn too much or too
little compensation compared with
the amount a hypothetical buyer
would pay a manager.
Or your nonparticipating spouse
may claim your business made more
money than the amount reported on
its tax returns. If the valuator
doesn’t adjust the financial
statements to include the income,
your company may be undervalued. On
the other hand, if the valuator
includes this income, the IRS may
come after your company.
Practice and personal
goodwill - Practice goodwill
considers such factors as the
business’s location, work force
quality and required licenses.
Personal goodwill focuses on you, as
the owner, and includes your age,
health, personal reputation and
involvement with the business. In
general, practice goodwill is
considered marketable but personal
goodwill is not -- unless an
enforceable agreement requires you
to continue involvement with the
business or practice and bars your
competing with the practice.
Non-compete agreements - In
most states, non-compete agreements
are not considered marital property.
If a considerable part of your
business’s value is predicated on or
would be allocated to a non-compete
agreement with your spouse retaining
the business, your valuator must be
aware that this value isn’t part of
the marital estate.
In Court - If you and your spouse are unable to
agree, the court will decide. Your
valuator must persuade the court
that his or her figure is the most
accurate one. Whatever method the
valuator uses, the figure must be
defensible. The report should
provide compelling evidence for that
figure. Vague or unsupported numbers
won’t hold up in court.
In almost every divorce case, the
court awards the business to one
spouse. Rarely does the court order
selling the business. But if it
does, the court usually asks the
valuator to determine a formula to
allow one spouse to buy out the
other.
A Balancing Act - Valuing assets in a divorce matter
is like walking a tightrope,
attempting to negotiate a difficult
transition -- without falling. We
are experienced with this type of
work. Please call us if you
anticipate needing a business
valuation as part of a divorce
settlement.
It’s not necessarily fair
(market value) -
A divorce settlement includes
the concept of equitable
distribution, which isn’t a factor
under a premise of fair market
value. The meaning of equitable
distribution varies from state to
state. The general idea is that the
court, which is supposed to judge
the best interests of the parties
involved, decides the settlement.
This differs from a sale, where the
parties are presumed able to look
out for themselves.
Your attorney should define the
standard of value and research
whether the court in that state will
permit any discounts. Some state
courts are reluctant in divorce
cases to allow various discounts
common to fair market valuations,
such as a “key person” discount if
that person is one of the spouses
and he or she intends to continue
working in the business.
In addition, some courts may not
allow discounts for difficulties in
getting financing for a buyout, poor
product diversity, low marketability
or unaudited financial statements,
arguing that these problems are
relevant only to potential buyers. |